Named medical trials garner extra attention | Science News



Support credible science journalism.

Subscribe to Science News today.


Named medical trials garner extra attention

11:19am, August 1, 2006

AVIATOR. SHOCK. AWESOME. Some medical researchers tag clinical studies with eye-grabbing acronyms to make them easier to refer to and remember. A new study suggests that an acronym also heightens the frequency with which other researchers cite a trial in subsequent publications. In essence, scientists have a bias toward discussing studies with short and catchy labels.

The extra attention lavished on studies tagged with acronyms could encourage doctors to apply the knowledge generated by those studies, researchers at the University of Toronto suggest in the July 6 New England Journal of Medicine. However, if acronyms encourage doctors to pay attention to named studies at the expense of unnamed ones, "this subtle linguistic tool could undermine evidence-based practice," Matthew B. Stanbrook and his collaborators say.

For their analysis, the researchers selected 173 randomized cardiovascular trials published since 1953. About a third of them had been labeled with

This article is available only to subscribing members. Join the Society today or Log in.

Get Science News headlines by e-mail.

More from this issue of Science News

From the Nature Index Paid Content