Transparency Project | Science News

SUPPORT SCIENCE NEWS.

Science News is a nonprofit.

Support us by subscribing now.

Transparency Project

Revealing 
how we do 
what we do 

Transparency Project


Transparency Project

We’re closing down our comment section

SN covers

Science News has always valued feedback from readers. And that is not going to change.

Sponsor Message

We value our readers’ input at Science News. Truly. Whether it’s enthusiasm, praise, criticism or a probing question, your feedback helps us understand what resonates, what doesn’t, and where we need to do better.

As we share the latest news in science with our growing audience online, we have offered many avenues for readers to share feedback. Increasingly we realize that the public comment section on our website is no longer working to foster conversations around scientific discovery and our coverage. Try as we might, spam slips through the cracks. Some comments have nothing to do with an article’s subject, and they spark interactions that can be off-topic and off-putting.

Unfortunately, those comments have drowned out feedback from people who are truly interested and engaged with what we do. And like at other news organizations, over time the number of comments has declined to the point where, in most cases, only a few people comment on each story. While many of those comments are considerate, witty and enlightening, the small number of participants limits conversation.

After much discussion here and with people at other news organizations, we’ve decided to focus on other avenues of communication. Next week, we are relaunching the Science News website without a comment section. Instead, you’ll be able to reach us through feedback@sciencenews.org with your questions and comments. We encourage you to join the conversation with us on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube and Reddit. And we still welcome good old physical letters.

Thank you to those who have contributed in constructive ways and made the comment section an interesting and thought-provoking place to visit. We look forward to more conversations with you.


Mike Denison
Mike Denison is the audience engagement editor and, until next week, the online comment moderator. He graduated from the University of Maryland with a double major in journalism and psychology. Read more »
About this bio
twitter logo
Mike Denison
Mike Denison is the audience engagement editor and, until next week, the online comment moderator. He graduated from the University of Maryland with a double major in journalism and psychology. Read more »
About this bio

Science & Society

How we reported on the challenges of using ancestry tests to solve crimes

By Tina Hesman Saey 12:24pm, April 26, 2019
Here’s how we found out what happened when an arrest was made in the Golden State Killer case that was tied to genetic testing.
Science & Society

How we reported a controversial story about the day the dinosaurs died

By Carolyn Gramling 12:24pm, April 26, 2019
Here’s how we covered the story of new fossils found in the Tanis site in North Dakota, including the story’s more controversial elements.
Science & Society

Introducing the Transparency Project

By Nancy Shute 12:23pm, April 26, 2019
The Transparency Project aims to be more open and accountable to readers by explaining key coverage decisions and showing how science journalism happens.
Subscribe to RSS - Transparency Project