Ideal Justice: Mathematicians judge the Supreme Court | Science News


Science News is a nonprofit.

Support us by subscribing now.


Ideal Justice: Mathematicians judge the Supreme Court

1:12pm, June 25, 2003

The U.S. Supreme Court–already in the news this week for its decisions on affirmative action–is highlighted in a scientific journal. The court is driven by politics far less than Congress is, a new analysis suggests.

Lawrence Sirovich, a mathematician at Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York City, calculated that the current Supreme Court of nine judges behaves as if it were made up of about 4.68 "ideal" judges–adjudicators who make their decisions completely independently of each other. To put that figure in perspective, Sirovich says, a court with a strict liberal-conservative divide would behave as if it had only one judge because all decisions would be determined purely by which faction made up the majority.

"The analysis shows that there is a great deal of independence among the justices," he says. Sirovich reports his findings in the June 24 Proceed

This article is only available to Science News subscribers. Already a subscriber? Log in now.
Or subscribe today for full access.

Get Science News headlines by e-mail.

More from Science News

From the Nature Index Paid Content