Context

Science past and present

Tom Siegfried

Context


Context

Nash’s mind left a beautiful legacy

Death of game theory pioneer ends a genius’s dramatic story

John Nash

Mathematician John Nash died in a car accident May 23 at the age of 86, ending a dramatic story of genius. 

Sponsor Message

His mind was beautiful, but troubled. His math was just beautiful.

John Forbes Nash Jr., who died in a traffic accident on May 23, gained more fame than most mathematicians, though not only on account of his math. His battle with schizophrenia, described artfully by Sylvia Nasar in her book A Beautiful Mind, made for drama suitable for a movie. Russell Crowe played Nash in the 2001 film, which garbled the math but made the point that despite his affliction, Nash accomplished works of genius — particularly in the theory of games.

That genius emerged in the 1940s when Nash was an undergraduate at Carnegie Tech, the forerunner to Carnegie Mellon University, in Pittsburgh. He started out as an electrical engineering student, but soon shifted to chemical engineering and then just plain chemistry. But the lab was not for him. He switched to math, and by age 20 he was on his way to graduate school at Princeton with a one-sentence letter of recommendation from a Carnegie professor: “This man is a genius.”

At Princeton, Nash revolutionized economic theory, showing how the freshly developed game theory of the great John von Neumann and Oskar Morgenstern could be made more relevant to real life. In their book, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, von Neumann and Morgenstern had attempted to derive a mathematics of strategy. They showed how participants in an economy could choose the most profitable behaviors. Von Neumann, one of the foremost mathematicians of his time, and Morgenstern, an economist, realized that their math could be applied to human behavior more broadly, evaluating strategic choices in realms from poker to warfare.

But the original theory offered rigorous solutions only for two-person games where the winner won what the loser lost (hence the label “zero-sum” game). Nash extended game theory both to cooperative situations (where win-win scenarios were possible) and to competitive games with multiple players.

Out of this work came the concept of the “Nash equilibrium,” the set of strategies that guaranteed the best possible payoff for all participants. Nash’s genius was to prove that at least one such set of strategies was always possible. In other words, as the economist Samuel Bowles once put it, there is always “a situation in which everybody is doing the best they can, given what everybody else is doing.”

In such situations, “equilibrium” means that as long as everybody else maintains the same strategy, anybody changing strategies would suffer a worse outcome. So equilibrium describes a stable situation, in which nobody has any incentive to change strategies.

Nash’s equilibrium became the bedrock upon which game theory’s future was built. “The concept of the Nash equilibrium is probably the single most fundamental concept in game theory,” Bowles said. And the economist Roger Myerson called it “one of the outstanding intellectual advances of the 20th century … comparable to that of the discovery of the DNA double helix.”

One of the deepest insights stemming from game theory is the notion that rarely is it wise to stick to a single strategy. In any but the simplest situations, Nash equilibrium is achieved only when players pursue a “mixed strategy.” In other words, a behavior is chosen from a probability distribution — a mix — of different specific strategies. In poker, for instance, a smart player with a losing hand sometimes bluffs and sometimes folds; game theory’s probability distribution tells you what percentage of the time to choose each strategy. This concept of mixed strategies explains all sorts of things about the natural world, from why ecosystems contain so many different species to why some people are cooperators while others are selfish.

Nash made other significant contributions to mathematics in the 1950s, but the dark specter of schizophrenia removed his mind from active engagement in the intellectual world for decades. But eventually his symptoms subsided. And then he was awarded the economics Nobel Prize in 1994, leading to the recognition of his work in both the book and movie A Beautiful Mind.

My own book on game theory emphasized the intellectual fallout from Nash’s math in fields other than economics. His methods were adopted, or adapted, in fields ranging from international diplomacy to evolutionary biology. Today it is widely acknowledged that game theory provides a common mathematical language for analyzing research across the entire spectrum of the social sciences. Game theory provides a method for quantifying human behavior, even though humans don’t always behave in the way a naïve application of game theory would suggest.

Game theory’s reach has extended beyond social sciences and biology. The probabilities involved in computing mixed game theory strategies are similar to those in other fields, such as statistical physics, information theory and even quantum mechanics, in the form of quantum game theory.

Nash, in fact, derived his notion of equilibrium in the first place from an analogy to physical science. When he studied chemistry, he encountered the law of mass action, the math describing how chemical reactions reach equilibrium. It’s a purely physical process of course, governed by the laws of thermodynamics, which drive natural systems to a state of energetic stability. Nash showed how a thoroughly analogous process, governed by the math of game theory, can drive economic or other social systems to a state of stability.

As I wrote recently, there are indications that game theory could prove useful in solving mysteries ranging from how to cure cancer to the origin of life. Perhaps game theory generally, and the Nash equilibrium in particular, captures something about relationships in the world that goes deeper than mere analogy. If so, that would be beautiful.  

Follow me on Twitter: @tom_siegfried

History of Science,, Science & Society

The medieval mentality of modern science

By Tom Siegfried 9:00am, November 21, 2014
Today’s scientists grapple with many of the same issues that stumped their medieval predecessors.
History of Science,, Science & Society

Top 10 science popularizers of all time

By Tom Siegfried 9:30am, November 7, 2014
Since antiquity, some notable thinkers have served society by translating science into popular form.
Human Evolution,, Anthropology

Human ancestor Lucy celebrates 40th anniversary

By Tom Siegfried 5:16pm, October 28, 2014
Paleoanthropologist Donald Johanson recalls the discovery 40 years ago of the human ancestor known as Lucy.
Numbers,, Science & Society

In science, popularity breeds unreliability

By Tom Siegfried 1:45pm, October 17, 2014
Popularity can mean unreliability both in science news coverage and within research itself.
Cosmology

Answers to questions posed by cosmology to philosophy

By Tom Siegfried 2:27pm, October 10, 2014
Tough questions about the philosophy of cosmology have answers; they just might not be right.
Numbers

Reproducing experiments is more complicated than it seems

By Tom Siegfried 11:46am, October 7, 2014
Statisticians have devised a new way to measure the evidence that an experimental result has really been reproduced.
Science & Society,, Numbers

Top 10 science anniversaries in 2014

By Tom Siegfried 11:35am, September 26, 2014
2014 is a rich year for scientific anniversaries, from the birth of Vesalius to quantum factoring.
Science & Society,, Numbers

There’s a new way to quantify structure and complexity

By Tom Siegfried 5:30pm, September 22, 2014
A new way to measure structure and complexity can help explain how information sharing among the parts of a system is related to its behaviors on different scales.
Quantum Physics

New analysis rescues quantum wave-particle duality

By Tom Siegfried 5:26pm, September 15, 2014
An experiment that supposedly contradicted the wave-particle duality principle of quantum physics has been reanalyzed, revealing a flaw.
Quantum Physics

Holography entangles quantum physics with gravity

By Tom Siegfried 5:00pm, September 8, 2014
Spacetime geometry, and therefore gravity, emerges from quantum entanglement, analyses using tensor networks show.
Subscribe to RSS - Context