I’m not allowed to touch the moon rocks.
In the room where NASA stores the samples that Apollo astronauts brought to Earth decades ago, I peer at rocks and trays of dirt through glass. But my tour guides are firm: Nobody touches the moon rocks.
This is the pristine sample lab at NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston. Being here is a big deal for me. I’ve spent years looking at cosmic rocks from a distance — my childhood involved lots of stargazing through a telescope, and in my college lab job, I processed pictures of Mars. I’ve been itching to scoop up a handful of alien sand and let it run through my fingers. Today, the opportunity feels as close as it is unlikely.
Before entering this clean room, I remove all my jewelry, including my wedding ring. My guides and I cover our shoes with blue paper booties and step into full-body jumpsuits with zippers from navel to neck and snaps at the ankles, wrists and throat. Once in the white bunny suits, we put on neoprene gloves, a hair cover, plus a pair of knee-high boots pulled over the blue booties. Finally, we spend a full minute standing in a phone booth–sized air shower, under a steady breeze blowing from ceiling to floor to clear us of any lingering dust.
Inside the clean room, I face another barrier: The rocks are stored in secure, pressurized cabinets — like big terrariums — filled with pure nitrogen. The only way to reach the samples is by sticking already-gloved hands into another set of gloves that wave from the cabinets like zombie arms.
Only five people in the world get to routinely handle these precious pebbles, sample processor Charis Krysher tells me. She’s one of them. But even Krysher and the lucky few can’t touch the samples directly. To pick up an Apollo rock, Krysher must either use stainless steel tweezers or slide her fingers into a third set of gloves made of Teflon.
“You do lose quite a bit of dexterity,” she says. “You get used to it, but it takes practice.”
All this effort is to protect the 382 kilograms of rocks, core samples, pebbles, sand and dust lifted from the moon during the six Apollo landings from 1969 through 1972. Those priceless samples are still offering fresh details about how the moon — and the entire solar system — formed and evolved. The rocks have revealed the rough ages of all the rocky planets’ surfaces and informed debate about whether an ancient reshuffling of the outer planets caused a bombardment of meteorites on Earth (SN Online: 9/12/16).
“One of the biggest misconceptions is that the Apollo samples aren’t being studied anymore, and that the Apollo samples only tell us about the moon,” says Ryan Zeigler, Apollo sample curator at the Johnson Space Center. “Neither of those is true.”
In fact, NASA is opening a cache of untouched samples for new studies on this 50th anniversary of the July 20, 1969 Apollo 11 moon landing.
Lunar science takes off
Since those first bits of moon arrived, NASA has sent about 50,000 individual samples to 500 research labs in more than 15 countries. Even with all that sharing, upward of 80 percent of the original haul is still untouched. Keeping with NASA’s hypercareful approach, nearly 15 percent of that lot is stored in a vault at the White Sands Test Facility near Las Cruces, N.M., a roughly 1,300-kilometer drive from Houston.
Designers also constructed this boxy, beige building in Houston, which opened in 1979, with certain disasters in mind. The structure is hurricane-resistant, and the pristine sample lab is one story above ground level to avoid flooding.
When the lunar samples first arrived on Earth, they were flown to Houston and quarantined for weeks (as were the astronauts). Researchers wanted to keep the samples safe from earthly contamination and keep Earth life safe from the samples. No one knew whether anything lived on the moon, or if potential moon life would be toxic to earthlings.
Those early samples were collected by Apollo 11 astronauts Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin, who scooped about 21.5 kilograms of moon rocks and dirt into storage boxes.
From that first collection, about 700 grams went to a biological test lab. There, samples were placed into secure chambers with mice, fish, birds, oysters, shrimp, cockroaches, houseflies, flatworms and single-celled organisms, plus 33 species of plants and seedlings. Scientists watched to make sure that none of the test species died or developed mutations, and that nothing grew in the moon grains themselves.
When nothing happened, seven kilograms or so of the Apollo 11 rocks were parceled out to laboratories around the world, as far from Houston as Tokyo and Canberra, Australia. Researchers studying those rocks agreed not to publish their findings before getting together to discuss them at the first Lunar Science Conference, which was held in Houston in January 1970.
“No other set of geologic samples has ever been investigated so extensively,” geologist (and later Apollo 17 astronaut) Harrison Schmitt and colleagues wrote in the introduction to the conference proceedings.
Those studies, which launched the discipline “lunar science,” almost immediately led to a new understanding of the moon’s origin. That theory is still the leading theory today: The moon formed, hot and molten, from the congealing debris of a giant impact between the young Earth and some other early planet (SN: 4/15/17, p. 18).
“What a beaut”
The fact that scientists had the right samples to reveal that the moon was once hot and gooey was a stroke of luck.
At the end of the first moonwalk, “the very last thing that happened was Neil Armstrong looked in the rock box and thought, this looks a little empty,” Zeigler says. So Armstrong shoveled in nine scoops of soil to keep the large samples from bouncing around. “It was an afterthought.”
That extra soil contained a treasure: tiny white and light gray rocks called anorthosites. These rocks stood out against the dark volcanic basalts that formed most of the landing site.
“The anorthosites were totally unexpected,” geologist John Wood and colleagues at the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory in Cambridge, Mass., wrote in 1970 in Science. The rocks’ low density suggested that they formed part of an ancient crust after rising to the surface of a lunar magma ocean, Wood’s team reasoned. If a large portion of the moon was once liquid magma, heavier stuff would sink in the goo, and lighter stuff like the anorthosites would rise. An independent team led by mineralogist Joseph Smith of the University of Chicago came up with a similar picture.
Our modern understanding of that lunar magma ocean is more complex, says planetary scientist Steve Elardo of the University of Florida in Gainesville. The moon must have gone through distinct stages to morph from that melted mass to today’s solid rock: first separating into light crust and dense mantle, and then cooling over time.
But when researchers measure the ages of rocks that should have come from those different eras, they all seem to be roughly the same: 4.35 billion years old.
The result “has thrown geochemists for a loop,” Elardo says. Either their measurements were wrong, or everything happened very quickly.
Still, the main idea that the whole moon was once liquid rock has held steady. In fact, geologists now think that’s the life cycle for most young planetlike bodies.
“We even talk about magma oceans, little ones, for asteroids,” Elardo says.
Those groups in 1970 had less than six months to study the samples, discover the anorthosites and figure out what it all meant. “And they basically got it right,” Elardo says. “That always kind of blows my mind a little bit.”
In 1971, NASA told Apollo 15 astronauts David Scott and James Irwin to look out for bright white rocks that could confirm this idea with more study. The mission transcript shows their excitement when they found one during a moonwalk.
“It’s about — oh, boy!” Scott said. “Guess what we just found…. What a beaut.” Irwin chimed in: “I think we found what we came for.”
Krysher shows me portions of both Armstrong’s and Scott’s samples, displayed in separate cabinets. The Apollo 11 soils fill what looks like two metal cupcake wrappers. Among a layer of dark grains, I can spot a few white flecks, the anorthosites. Scott’s rock is nicknamed the Genesis Rock because at the time, it was among the oldest moon rocks known. I can see why it stood out: It’s a brilliant, chalky white. The remnant on display is smaller than I expected, about the size of a lime. It could easily fit in my hand.
“May I hold it?” I ask Krysher. No dice. I had to ask, even though Zeigler had warned me in an e-mail before I arrived: “We have pretty strict rules about people putting their (gloved) hands in the cabinets to touch samples. Basically, it’s an only-if-you-walked-on-the-moon rule.”
A wet world
Keeping pristine samples away from curious fingers allowed scientists to make one of the most surprising lunar discoveries of the last 50 years: The moon is wet. Over the last decade, scientists have found hundreds of times more water in lunar samples than researchers in the Apollo era realized existed.
The first studies of Apollo samples suggested that the moon was bone-dry, with less than 1 part per billion of water. That made sense: If the moon was born hot, water and other easily vaporized molecules would have boiled away quickly.
But in the late 2000s, researchers began to find hints of ancient moisture trapped in lunar samples. Alberto Saal of Brown University and colleagues used an ion microprobe to find water molecules deep within tiny volcanic glass beads from lunar soils, the team reported in Nature in 2008 (SN: 8/2/08, p. 12).
Based on the amount of water in the beads, the researchers estimated that the magma beneath the moon’s crust could have had up to 750 parts per million water. Then later studies found water in the moon’s deeper mantle, perhaps as much as Earth’s: tens to hundreds of parts per million, planetary scientist Francis McCubbin of NASA Johnson said in March at the Lunar and Planetary Science Conference in The Woodlands, Texas.
There’s still a lot of disagreement about exactly how much water the moon contains, McCubbin said. But keeping lunar samples under pristine conditions was crucial for discovering water 40 years after the rocks were brought to Earth. “Making sure we curate those samples in a way that our grandchildren and their grandchildren can keep making discoveries is critically important,” he said.
This, I realize, is one reason why I can’t touch the moon rocks. I’m too full of water. So is the air.
That’s the whole point of sample curation, says processor Lacey Costello. “Research gets all the glory.” But curation is crucial.
Processors preserve and prepare the samples, making sure there’s no contamination. Without that effort, Costello says, the data that researchers get wouldn’t be accurate. “How could you trust it if the samples might have been contaminated?”
Curation involves more than just three sets of gloves. Processors maintain a detailed database of every sample ever taken from the moon, plus every chip and slice that was ever divided from the original sample. These specialists photograph and record the mass of every subsample before filing it away in a vault, behind the same kind of door that protects the U.S. gold reserves at Fort Knox. The processors even maintain the north-south and up-down orientation that the rocks had on the moon.
“We do have extensive procedures,” says processor Andrea Mosie, a Houston native who has worked in the lunar samples lab for 43 years. She was a high school intern at the Manned Spacecraft Center — the Johnson Space Center’s original name — in July 1969 when the first rocks came in.
Her supervisor let her sit in on lunar mission planning meetings. “I actually did more than I was supposed to do, which was really encouraging,” she says. “And I was in the same building with the astronauts, so that was great.”
After earning degrees in chemistry and math, Mosie returned to NASA. “The clean room has been the perfect place for me … because I’m a very picky person,” she said in a talk at the Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. “Everything has a procedure. I probably get on a lot of people’s nerves.”
Mosie trained Krysher, Costello and other processors who joined the lab. “She’s our moon goddess,” Krysher jokes. Krysher started in the lunar lab about five years ago, after spending the better part of a decade as an aerospace engineer.
Costello also switched from aerospace engineering to geology after a lecture on meteorites sparked a passion for planets. She’s the newbie, having joined the lab in January. She soon realized that a big part of her job is helping researchers identify the best sample for their studies.
“Curators acquire the most intimate knowledge of the samples,” Costello says. “A lot of times researchers know what they want. But there are times where they think they know what they want, and they maybe don’t.”
Once the right moon rock is chosen, processors break off a tiny piece of the main sample. A typical subsample sent to a research group weighs between half a gram and a gram, and could fill maybe a quarter of a teaspoon.
“Over the years, the scientists have been able to do more with a lot less,” Krysher says. That’s why so much of the collection is still pristine.
There are procedures to account for human foibles, too. To minimize contamination, only three materials may come into direct contact with the samples: aluminum, stainless steel and Teflon. Hence the tweezers and extra gloves. And if dust or a piece of a rock breaks off during sampling, that bit becomes a new sample.
I finally get my chance to play processor. I see an empty cabinet, and to my delight, my guides let me put my double-gloved hands in and pretend to process a sample.
I struggle to stretch my fingers into the gloves, which wave like balloons from the higher pressure inside the cabinet. The rubber wraps tightly around my arms: I almost feel like I’m pushing my arms into a thick liquid. I clumsily pick up a stainless steel hammer and a chisel inside the cabinet. I mimic chipping a corner off of an imaginary sample. Even without a real moon rock, I find myself laughing with joy.
For the curators, “that excitement lasts forever,” Mosie tells me. “Every time you handle a sample, you … realize that you’re one of the few who will ever be doing this.… That’s a special opportunity, and it’s an awesome responsibility.”
Geologist Beck Strauss remembers that feeling. While a postdoc at Rutgers University in Piscataway, N.J., Strauss got to open a pristine sample from Apollo 12.
“That was one of the coolest things I’ve gotten to do — to be the first person to hold a piece of this rock,” says Strauss, now at the National Institute of Standards and Technology in Gaithersburg, Md.
At Rutgers, Strauss and colleagues studied magnetic fields preserved in lunar rocks to figure out how the moon’s interior has changed over time. Churning liquid rock in the moon’s core, or at the boundary between the core and mantle, could have driven a magnetic field that weakened as the moon cooled and solidified.
Strauss presented work at the March Lunar and Planetary Science Conference suggesting that the early moon had a strong magnetic field that faded by 3 billion years ago. The moon maintained a weaker magnetic field for another 1 billion to 2 billion years before the field dropped to essentially nothing today.
With advances over the last 50 years, geologists can measure smaller and smaller magnetic fields in the moon rocks, Strauss says, that “let us get at information that was just physically inaccessible during the Apollo era.”
And Strauss feels all that history in the work. “For me to do the experiments I’m doing and collect the data I have, we basically had to invent spaceflight,” Strauss says. Nearly 50 years after Apollo, Strauss got to walk into the lab, open a safe, “and take out these incredible little pieces of our moon and learn all sorts of really cool things about them. I think that’s awesome.”
When NASA sends samples to research labs, no special government courier service is used, just the regular mail, FedEx or UPS. To deter thieves, the curators make the packages inconspicuous. “We obviously don’t write: ‘This is a moon rock in here,’ ” Mosie says. She admits that a few samples have been lost in the mail. But there’s no point insuring them. “They’re priceless,” she says. No amount of money can replace them.
But there are ways to find new samples in the same old rocks. A lot of the Apollo rocks are cementlike aggregates called breccias, which can hide rocks on the inside that aren’t visible from the outside. Until recently, the only way to find those hidden rocks was to break the breccias open with a chisel. But in 2017, the pristine sample lab got a CT scanner to take a look inside the rocks without breaking them. That will let curators know where to cut the rocks to extract unseen bits.
Some untouched samples are about to come out of storage. Three tubes of soil pulled from the lunar surface during Apollo 15, 16 and 17 have been sealed since the 1970s. In March, NASA announced that nine research teams will receive precious bits from those tubes.
And new missions are on the horizon. In April, NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine announced a proposal to land U.S. astronauts on the moon again as early as 2024. China plans to launch a sample-return mission to the farside of the moon later this year (SN: 11/24/18, p. 14). Those moon rocks will be the first samples from that region of the moon and the first returned at all since 1976.
“Getting samples from another part of the moon would revolutionize our understanding of the moon and of the solar system, just like the Apollo samples did,” Zeigler says.
I thought I might have to apply to be an astronaut to finally get my hands on a moon rock. But I found an easier way. The Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum in Washington, D.C., has a slice of basalt, called the Touch Rock, from Apollo 17 on display. Anyone can walk right up and touch it.
I can’t suppress a smile when I run my fingers over it. The stone is cool and smooth, like a river rock. But instead of being worn down by water and time, this piece of our moon has been polished by millions of human hands.