Peer Review under the Microscope | Science News



Support credible science journalism.

Subscribe to Science News today.


Peer Review under the Microscope

One journal's experiment aims to change science vetting

10:51am, December 12, 2006

This September, physicist Sergey Kravchenko of Northeastern University in Boston did something that scientists do hundreds of times over the course of their careers: He and his colleagues submitted their latest research findings to a scientific journal. The researchers had performed a study that they say experimentally verifies a theory on how electrons interact in semiconductors. They submitted their report to the prestigious journal Nature.

Getting findings published, either on paper or on the Web, is the final step in entering a researcher's work into the scientific record. To make sure that the research is worthy of joining this hallowed collection, most journals use a method called peer review.

Put simply, peer review subjects scientists' work to the scrutiny of other scientists in the same field. These typically anonymous reviewers weed out research with flawed methods or conclusions and work that isn't a good fit for a particular journal. They also provi

This article is available only to subscribing members. Join the Society today or Log in.

Get Science News headlines by e-mail.

More from Science News

From the Nature Index Paid Content