Whether to go all out or save energy for final depends on team’s goal
When it comes to tournament-style competitions, people tend to focus on the championship round: the Super Bowl, the general election, the final interviews for a job opening. But consider the importance of the semifinal. A loss guarantees a finish of no better than third place, but the all-out effort needed for winning can bring a high cost: Competitors may be too drained in the championship.
Exploring this semifinalists’ dilemma, physicist Hyeong-Chai Jeong at Sejong University in Seoul, South Korea, and colleagues used game theory to determine optimal strategies for four evenly matched semifinalists. In a winner-takes-all format, Jeong’s team says it’s best to match opponents’ strategies, such as resting key players. That way, rival semifinalists can stay competitive with each other and have enough left in the tank for a potential final.
Competitors have more options if they’re willing to settle for bronze. They can exert maximum effort in