Letters from the January 27, 2007, issue of Science News | Science News



Support credible science journalism.

Subscribe to Science News today.

Letters to the Editor

Letters from the January 27, 2007, issue of Science News

12:15am, January 22, 2007

Circumcision circumspection

Concerning "More Evidence of Protection: Circumcision reduces STD risk in men" (SN: 11/18/06, p. 325), I have yet to read a single study regarding the alleged benefits of circumcision that acknowledges that the foreskin is erogenous tissue. Removal of erogenous tissue from a female would be considered barbaric, even if it did offer some protection against sexually transmitted diseases.

Jerry Malone
Pueblo, Colo.

This is surgery, which should always be taken seriously. Removing all our appendixes would prevent appendicitis as well, but no one is suggesting such an extreme measure. I would not consider circumcision for my children because it offers some help in preventing diseases they can prevent by their own behavior. Certainly, that cost-benefit analysis may be different in a country with a much higher rate of HIV infection, but I think the article's portrayal of circu

This article is available only to subscribing members. Join the Society today or Log in.

Get Science News headlines by e-mail.

More from Science News

From the Nature Index Paid Content