Science should be prominent in U.S. foreign policy
From the August 2, 2008 issue of Science News
By Science News
On May 28, the World Science Summit held in New York City convened an assembly of prominent scientists to discuss some of the critical issues at the interface between science and society. One of the panel discussions at the summit addressed the topic of the role of science in foreign affairs. Among the participants were Harold Varmus, former director of the National Institutes of Health and now president of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York; David Baltimore, former president of Caltech and Rockefeller University in New York; and Nina Fedoroff, a plant geneticist who is the science adviser to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. Excerpts from their comments follow below.
Varmus: A component of my life is devoted to trying to make science a more global activity to address many of the unsolved problems that we’ve been hearing about.… Energy or food or water or health, every domain of activity, regionally or globally, can be influenced by science, and it’s become the conviction of many of us that paying attention to science is an element of foreign policy. It is a commandment that ought to be listened to by every administration.…
Science is an attractive way to try to reach out to other countries, even countries with different ideologies, because science practices common methods. Most scientists speak the same languages; science addresses issues that tend to be regional if not global; … science profits from and often depends upon collaborations carried out in an international way; … and science creates global public goods, information that everyone can use for the betterment of the world.…
There are a lot of opportunities for any administration, especially a new one, to foster science abroad and to enhance the status of the U.S. as a partner in doing good in the world.