Rating Researchers | Science News

MISSION CRITICAL

Support credible science journalism.

Subscribe to Science News today.


Math Trek

Rating Researchers

By
2:12pm, December 2, 2005

For baseball pitchers, it's the earned run average. For National Football League passers, it's the quarterback rating. In each case, a single number gives some sense of a player's value.

How would you quantify the cumulative impact and relevance of a researcher's scientific work? Furthermore, is there a single number that would usefully characterize a scientist's output?

"In a world of limited resources, such quantification (even if potentially distasteful) is often needed for evaluation and comparison purposes," physicist Jorge E. Hirsch of the University of California, San Diego argues in the Nov. 15 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Such ratings can be (and already have been) used to measure the impact of research and to justify tenure and funding decisions. Analyses of these measures can also generate rankings of scholarly journals, academic departm

This article is available only to subscribing members. Join the Society today or Log in.

Get Science News headlines by e-mail.

More from Science News

From the Nature Index Paid Content