Body clock affects racing prowess
When it comes to athletic performance, everyone’s a night owl, a new study suggests.
Shawn D. Youngstedt and his colleagues at the University of South Carolina in Columbia erased time-of-day cues in 25 trained collegiate swimmers by keeping them perpetually in low lighting for 2 days at the school’s fitness center. Throughout the study, each athlete adhered to a short sleep-wake cycle: 1 hour of rest followed by 2 hours of sedentary activity. The starting time of the cycle differed among the participants.
Science News headlines, in your inbox
Headlines and summaries of the latest Science News articles, delivered to your email inbox every Thursday.
Thank you for signing up!
There was a problem signing you up.
Core body temperature, on average, ebbs near 5 a.m. The lowest daily temperature varied slightly throughout the test.
Once every 9 hours, each volunteer was instructed to swim a 200-meter freestyle race at peak speed. Start times varied between 2 a.m. and 11 p.m.
A swimmer typically racked up his or her worst time about 5 a.m., which was within a few hours of his or her daily body-temperature minimum, the researchers report in the February Journal of Applied Physiology. From then on, times improved—peaking at 11 p.m. Differences between an individual’s performance extremes varied by almost 6 seconds and proved independent of whether the swimmer initially had been an early bird or a night owl, according to his or her previous sleep schedule, Youngstedt notes.
Although time-of-day effects might make little difference for well-rested athletes competing close to home, Youngstedt says that they could significantly handicap jet-lagged athletes performing in global competitions. In those instances, the Carolina team concludes, athletes might consider using tricks—such as exposure to bright light (SN: 5/27/06, p. 330: Light Impacts)—to reset their body clocks to coordinate with competition times.