Stimulus bill doesn’t ignore R&D
Rumors have circulated for weeks about how robustly the economic-stimulus package would invest in research and development. The first solid clues emerged yesterday when the House Appropriations Committee released draft legislation to finance a jump-starting of the nation’s moribund economy. The bill suggests that although overall science won’t come out a big winner, energy and biomedical-research programs might. Another notable theme: a strong commitment to upgrding the infrastructure to support quality research.
Although released by the House, the package also has broad support of Democratic lawmakers in the Senate — and closely reflects the policies advocated by Barack Obama over the past six months.
The list that follows is not all-inclusive, but identifies many of the major R&D-related programs in the 258-page spending blueprint, such as recommendations to spend:
A whopping $21-plus billion at the Energy Department, which would include
Science News headlines, in your inbox
Headlines and summaries of the latest Science News articles, delivered to your email inbox every Thursday.
Thank you for signing up!
There was a problem signing you up.
1) $4.9 billion for implementing aspects of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act and $3.5 billion for energy efficiency and conservation block grants;
2) $4.5 billion to modernize the electric grid, enhance the security of electrical production and support research on energy storage;
3) $2.4 billion for programs to demonstrate carbon-dioxide capture and sequestration technologies;
4) $2 billion for energy efficiency and renewable energy research (of which at least $800 million must be available for biomass studies and $400 million for geothermal projects);
5) $2 billion for science programs, of which at least 20 percent must be reserved for projects at the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy — and at least of quarter of this spending ($100 million) must fund advanced scientific computing;
6) $1 billion for manufacturing advanced batteries, and another $1 billion for an “advanced battery loan guarantee program;”
For the National Institutes of Health and related agencies, $6.66 billion, including
Subscribe to Science News
Get great science journalism, from the most trusted source, delivered to your doorstep.
1) $2 billion to help foster the information-technology standards that would aid a national transition to fully computerized patient-health records;
2) $1.5 billion to support NIH research, although only half of that money would be available before the start of the next fiscal year (Oct. 1);
3) another $1.5 billion to renovate or repair non-federal research facilities through grants administered by the National Center for Research Resources;
4) $700 million for comparative-effectiveness research — studies to identify which of several different treatments works best (and for whom); and money to commission the Institute of Medicine to “produce and submit a report to the Congress … not later than June 30, 2009, that includes recommendations on the national priorities for comparative-effectiveness research to be supported with the funds in this [stimulus package]
5) $962 million for “high-priority” upgrades to facilities and equipment at NIH and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention;
At the National Science Foundation, $3 billion:
1) the bulk of which — $2.5 billion — would go for research and related activities. Of this total, at least $200 million must be reserved to pay for major research instrumentation grants;
2) $400 million for construction of major research equipment and facilities;
3) and $100 million for education “and human resources.”
$2.7 billion at the Interior Department:
1) with $1.7 billion going for deferred maintenance and related projects within the National Park System;
2) $500 million for water reclamation and reuse programs;
3) $300 million for infrastructure upgrades and critical deferred maintenance on Fish & Wildlife Service properties, including wildlife refuges and fish hatcheries
4) $200 million to the U.S. Geological Survey to repair or upgrade facilities, replace equipment, conduct national mapping activities, strengthen seismic and volcano monitoring systems and more.
Department of Agriculture:
1) going to the U.S. Forest Service for wildlands-fire management and capital improvements (which includes energy efficiency enhancements, remediation of abandoned mine sites, removal of fish-passage barriers and watershed enhancements).
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration:
1) with $600 million for climate programs and related satellite procurements, of which at least $140 million must be reserved for the modeling of climate data;
2) and $400 million for habitat restoration and mitigation work.
Environmental Protection Agency:
1) with 80 percent available for cleaning up Superfund sites and the rest for addressing the nation’s leaking underground storage tanks.
$600 million at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration:
1) with $400 million to be spent for science, at least $250 million of which could be spent only on “accelerating the development of the tier 1 set of Earth science climate research missions;”
2) another $150 million to boost spending on aeronautics R&D;
3) and $50 million for infrastructure upgrades to facilities damaged during 2008 by hurricanes, floods and other nature disasters.
And $500 million at the National Institute of Standards and Technology:
1) with $100 million for science and technical research, another $100 million for “industrial technology services (70 percent of which would go to NIST’s Technology Innovation Program and the rest for its Hollings Manufacturing Extension Partnership);
2) and $300 million for construction of research-science buildings.