See where Clinton and Trump stand on science | Science News

Real Science. Real News.

Science News is a nonprofit.

Support us by subscribing now.


See where Clinton and Trump stand on science

Here are the presidential candidates’ comments on seven key research-related policy issues

12:25pm, September 13, 2016
Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump

SCIENCE SHOWDOWN In a speech here and a response there, presidential candidates Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump have provided glimpses of where they stand on key science issues.

Hillary Clinton’s “I believe in science” declaration aside, science has not played a starring role in the 2016 presidential election. Far from it. For the most part, the candidates’ science policies have trickled out in dribs and drabs, and in varying degrees of detail — talking points on a website here, a passing comment in response to a spur-of-the-moment question there.

Yet science underpins our understanding of, and response to, the world around us. It answers everything from why our coffee sloshes dangerously to what could happen if the planet warms another degree or two. Science often intersects with public policy, and presidential leadership influences research priorities.

With that in mind, Science News examines where Clinton, the Democratic Party nominee, and Republican Party nominee Donald Trump stand on seven scientific issues with the power to impact our future. Our writers looked at what the candidates have said

This article is only available to Science News subscribers. Already a subscriber? Log in now.
Or subscribe today for full access.

Get Science News headlines by e-mail.

More from Science News

From the Nature Index Paid Content